Our grade: 4 checks
Based on public data, not a full audit. See how we grade. Something changed? Request a re-grade.
Community rating
-
No community reviews yet
Ran this server? Tell others if you would trust it in production. Reviews are separate from our grade.
Write a reviewWhy it got a B
An MIT community server from one developer (GitHub pandadad0214, "Panda Federation"), on PyPI and in the official MCP Registry since November 2026. It's a thin wrapper: each tool runs one of the author's Actors on Apify, billed to your own Apify account. Seven checks of public DNS, pages, links and feeds: email_domain_security_checker (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS and BIMI, graded A to F), ai_search_seo_audit, website_change_monitor (compares pages with the last run and can post changes to a webhook you give it), hidden_ai_instructions_scanner (finds text on a page that people can't see but AI agents read), bulk_domain_whois_expiry, broken_link_checker and rss_feed_monitor. It isn't a penetration test or a logged-in scan. Results cost about $0.0005 to $0.004 each; the hidden-text scanner has no per-result price, but its runs still use your Apify platform credit. Each call is capped at $0.50 by default, but the AI can raise that cap to $25 for a call, and PANDA_MAX_CHARGE_USD only changes the default. Every tool is marked read-only, so a client that skips approval for read-only tools won't ask before a call spends money. Text pulled from pages and feeds is untrusted input. The Actors that do the work are closed source, but they run with Apify's limited permissions, so they can't read the rest of your Apify account. No advisories on record. Biggest deduction: the README has you paste your default Apify token, which can use your whole Apify account; create a scoped token that can only run pandadad0214's Actors, with an expiry date, and use that instead.
How to connect
// Cursor MCP config (README)
{"mcpServers": {"panda-web-security-tools": {"command": "uvx", "args": ["panda-web-security-tools"], "env": {"APIFY_TOKEN": "apify_api_YOUR_TOKEN"}}}}
Is Panda Web Security Tools safe?
Is Panda Web Security Tools safe to use?
Panda Web Security Tools grades B (solid, with minor gaps). Login is required, but access is coarse: one sign-in or key covers more than your agent needs, so grant the narrowest account you can. Upkeep is hard to verify (closed source or a single maintainer), so pin the version you tested. It runs locally over stdio, so it acts with your machine's access.
Does Panda Web Security Tools have known vulnerabilities?
Not in our current data: it has no open CVEs or advisories. We re-check as new ones are published.
Does Panda Web Security Tools support authentication?
Yes. It requires a login, so access can be tied to a person or a scoped key.
Alternatives in Developer Tools
- A Atlassian Rovo MCP ServerOfficial hosted Atlassian server for Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management, Compass, Bitbucket, Loom, Goals, Projects, and Teams, with OAuth 2.1 sign-in.
- A Buildkite MCP ServerOfficial Buildkite server for pipelines, builds, jobs, logs, annotations, and Test Engine data, hosted or local.
- A Dynatrace Remote MCP ServerDynatrace's hosted MCP server, running inside your Dynatrace SaaS environment, to run and explain DQL, look into problems, vulnerabilities and Kubernetes events, and forecast time series.
- A GitHub MCP ServerOfficial GitHub server for repos, issues, pull requests, Actions, and code security, hosted or local.
- A GitLab MCP ServerGitLab's built-in MCP server for projects, merge requests, work items, code, and CI pipelines, on GitLab.com or your own instance.
Community reviews
No published community reviews yet.
Write a review
Ran this server? Tell other teams how it went. You get one review per server. We email you a link to confirm it, then an editor checks it before it goes up. We never show your email.