Our grade: 4 checks
Based on public data, not a full audit. See how we grade. Something changed? Request a re-grade.
Community rating
- 5 5
- 4 4
- 3 0
- 2 0
- 1 0
Trust in production
- Trust it - 89%
- With caveats - 11%
- Wouldn't - 0%
100% would recommend this server
How reviewers scored it
- Setup & docs 4.3
- Auth experience 4.4
- Reliability 4.6
- Maintainer responsiveness 4.6
Why it got an A
Atlassian's official server, hosted over HTTPS with OAuth 2.1 by default. Tools sit in read, write and search permission groups, delete and admin tools stay off until an admin turns them on, and admins can restrict client domains, enforce IP allowlists and see every call in the audit log. The many 2026 "MCP Atlassian" CVEs belong to the community sooperset/mcp-atlassian project, not this server. Biggest deduction: the server code is closed source, so we scored maintenance one band lower.
How to connect
// "Add to Cursor" link in Atlassian's README (server name Atlassian-Rovo-MCP); config decoded from the link's base64 payload
{"url":"https://mcp.atlassian.com/v2/mcp"}
// "Add to VS Code" link in Atlassian's README (server name Atlassian-Rovo-MCP); config URL-decoded from the link
{"url":"https://mcp.atlassian.com/v2/mcp","type":"http"}
claude mcp add --transport http atlassian https://mcp.atlassian.com/v2/mcp
// claude_desktop_config.json (Atlassian's getting-started page; or Settings > Extensions > Plugins > Atlassian)
{ "mcpServers": { "atlassian": { "url": "https://mcp.atlassian.com/v2/mcp" } } }
Is Atlassian Rovo MCP Server safe?
Is Atlassian Rovo MCP Server safe to use?
Atlassian Rovo MCP Server grades A (strong public trust signals). Upkeep is hard to verify (closed source or a single maintainer), so pin the version you tested.
Does Atlassian Rovo MCP Server have known vulnerabilities?
Not in our current data: it has no open CVEs or advisories. We re-check as new ones are published.
Does Atlassian Rovo MCP Server support authentication?
Yes. It requires a login, so access can be tied to a person or a scoped key.
Alternatives in Developer Tools
- A Buildkite MCP ServerOfficial Buildkite server for pipelines, builds, jobs, logs, annotations, and Test Engine data, hosted or local.
- A Dynatrace Remote MCP ServerDynatrace's hosted MCP server, running inside your Dynatrace SaaS environment, to run and explain DQL, look into problems, vulnerabilities and Kubernetes events, and forecast time series.
- A GitHub MCP ServerOfficial GitHub server for repos, issues, pull requests, Actions, and code security, hosted or local.
- A GitLab MCP ServerGitLab's built-in MCP server for projects, merge requests, work items, code, and CI pipelines, on GitLab.com or your own instance.
- A Honeycomb MCPHoneycomb's hosted MCP server to query datasets, read traces, run BubbleUp, and read or change boards, triggers and SLOs, with per-resource OAuth scopes.
Community reviews
Good defaults, good docs
Replaced a homegrown script with Atlassian Rovo MCP Server and have not looked back. The OAuth flow worked first time in Claude Code. Good choice if you need Atlassian Rovo in your agent.
Used for Letting a coding agent open and triage issues
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Surprisingly polished
Of the Atlassian Rovo integrations I tried, this one is the most predictable. Filed an issue and got a reply within two days.
Used for Looking up Atlassian Rovo data without leaving the editor
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Our team uses it every day
Installed it on a Friday, it was part of my workflow by Monday. Updates land regularly, and nothing broke when I upgraded. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Fine in production if you sandbox it.
Used for Code review summaries for pull requests
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Trustworthy enough for real work
Started with it as an experiment, now it is a fixture. I like that access goes through a proper sign-in instead of a long-lived secret on disk. Nice to use something maintained by Atlassian rather than a random fork. It is in our production agent and I sleep fine.
Used for Pairing with Claude Code on a monorepo
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Easy win for our agent setup
Simple to set up in Cursor, simple to reason about. I like that access goes through a proper sign-in instead of a long-lived secret on disk.
Used for Onboarding new devs with an agent that answers repo questions
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Recommended it to two teams already
Set this up for our team after comparing a few options. Updates land regularly, and nothing broke when I upgraded. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. I would prefer to read the code, but the hosted service has been dependable.
Used for Scripting routine maintenance tasks
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Better than the DIY script it replaced
Hooked Atlassian Rovo MCP Server into Claude Code and it worked on the first try. Releases come often and the changelog is clear. Nothing to install, I just point the client at the URL. Happy to run it in production.
Used for Keeping project tickets in sync with code changes
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
No complaints after a month
Clear tool names, sensible outputs, very few surprises. Filed an issue and got a reply within two days. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Would recommend without hesitation.
Used for Internal developer assistant
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Solid and well behaved
Our agents call this dozens of times a day. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file.
Used for Generating boilerplate from existing patterns
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Write a review
Ran this server? Tell other teams how it went. You get one review per server. We email you a link to confirm it, then an editor checks it before it goes up. We never show your email.