VendorHoneycomb
Connects overhttp

Our grade: 4 checks

Login Scoped login by default
Upkeep Active · 2026-11
Known bugs 0 open
Connection http

Based on public data, not a full audit. See how we grade. Something changed? Request a re-grade.

Community rating

4.4 9 reviews
67% would trust it in production
  • 5 4
  • 4 5
  • 3 0
  • 2 0
  • 1 0

Trust in production

  • Trust it - 67%
  • With caveats - 33%
  • Wouldn't - 0%

100% would recommend this server

How reviewers scored it

  • Setup & docs 4.2
  • Auth experience 4.7
  • Reliability 4.4
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4.2

Why it got an A

Honeycomb's official MCP server, hosted at mcp.honeycomb.io (EU: mcp.eu1.honeycomb.io), for teams with Honeycomb Intelligence turned on. You sign in with OAuth and pick Read all, Read and write all, or Customize to choose access per resource, per team. Read-only members can only grant read. Most tools read: queries, traces, spans, BubbleUp, the service map (Enterprise) and semantic conventions. Write scopes let the AI create and update boards, triggers, SLOs and recipients, and start Canvas investigations, so pick Read all unless you need those. Agents that can't log in use a Management API key instead. The old self-hosted honeycombio/honeycomb-mcp repo is archived and deprecated (it ran without auth and needed a full-permission API key). No advisories on record. Biggest deduction: the hosted server is closed source, so we can't check its update cadence and scored maintenance one band lower.

How to connect

// mcp.json (EU: https://mcp.eu1.honeycomb.io/mcp)
{ "mcpServers": { "honeycomb": { "url": "https://mcp.honeycomb.io/mcp" } } }

Is Honeycomb MCP safe?

Is Honeycomb MCP safe to use?

Honeycomb MCP grades A (strong public trust signals). Upkeep is hard to verify (closed source or a single maintainer), so pin the version you tested.

Does Honeycomb MCP have known vulnerabilities?

Not in our current data: it has no open CVEs or advisories. We re-check as new ones are published.

Does Honeycomb MCP support authentication?

Yes. It requires a login, so access can be tied to a person or a scoped key.

Embed this badge

Maintain this server? Add the grade to your README.

TrustedMCP grade A

Markdown

[![TrustedMCP grade A](https://trustedmcp.io/badge/honeycomb-mcp.svg)](https://trustedmcp.io/servers/honeycomb-mcp)

HTML

<a href="https://trustedmcp.io/servers/honeycomb-mcp"><img src="https://trustedmcp.io/badge/honeycomb-mcp.svg" alt="TrustedMCP grade A" height="80"></a>

Community reviews

Ingrid Nilsson Security engineer
Trusts with caveats Recommends

Set it up once, forgot about it

Of the Honeycomb integrations I tried, this one is the most predictable. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. Releases come often and the changelog is clear.

Used for Automating release notes

  • Setup & docs 4/5
  • Auth experience 4/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Mei Lin Senior developer
Trusts with caveats Recommends

Saves me a context switch every hour

Been running this for about a month now. Turned on read-only mode on day one, highly recommend doing the same. Worth it, just do not skip the hardening steps.

Used for Scripting routine maintenance tasks

  • Setup & docs 4/5
  • Auth experience 4/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Karan Mehta AI engineer
Trusts with caveats Recommends

Recommended it to two teams already

Simple to set up in Cursor, simple to reason about. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file. Recommended, with sensible guardrails.

Used for Generating boilerplate from existing patterns

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 4/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Raj Malhotra Backend engineer
Trusts in production Recommends

No complaints after a month

Replaced a homegrown script with Honeycomb MCP and have not looked back. Nothing to install, I just point the client at the URL. Read-only mode is the first thing I enable, and it covers most of what I need. Filed an issue and got a reply within two days. Good choice if you need Honeycomb in your agent.

Used for Debugging sessions in Cursor

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Tomas Novak Indie hacker
Trusts in production Recommends

Easy win for our agent setup

Started with it as an experiment, now it is a fixture. You can tell it is actively maintained, the rough edges keep getting fixed. Turned on read-only mode on day one, highly recommend doing the same. Easy recommendation.

Used for Pairing with Claude Code on a monorepo

  • Setup & docs 4/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Ben Carter Staff engineer
Trusts in production Recommends

Earned a permanent spot in my config

Clear tool names, sensible outputs, very few surprises. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file. Would recommend without hesitation.

Used for Onboarding new devs with an agent that answers repo questions

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Tobias Becker Platform engineer
Trusts in production Recommends

Worth the five minutes to set up

Set this up for our team after comparing a few options. Updates land regularly, and nothing broke when I upgraded. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Happy to run it in production.

Used for Internal developer assistant

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Chris Turner Full-stack developer
Trusts in production Recommends

Better than the DIY script it replaced

Hooked Honeycomb MCP into Claude Code and it worked on the first try. Narrowing the scopes took ten minutes and made me much happier running it.

Used for CI failure investigation

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Ayesha Siddiqui Solo founder
Trusts in production Recommends

Our team uses it every day

Installed it on a Friday, it was part of my workflow by Monday. Read-only mode is the first thing I enable, and it covers most of what I need. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. It is in our production agent and I sleep fine.

Used for Code review summaries for pull requests

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 5/5

Write a review

Ran this server? Tell other teams how it went. You get one review per server. We email you a link to confirm it, then an editor checks it before it goes up. We never show your email.

How was it overall?

Would you trust it in production?
Would you recommend it to another team?

Score the details

Setup & docs
Auth experience
Reliability
Maintainer responsiveness

Tell other teams how it went

About you