Our grade: 4 checks
Based on public data, not a full audit. See how we grade. Something changed? Request a re-grade.
Community rating
- 5 1
- 4 6
- 3 4
- 2 5
- 1 0
Trust in production
- Trust it - 44%
- With caveats - 31%
- Wouldn't - 25%
63% would recommend this server
How reviewers scored it
- Setup & docs 3.1
- Auth experience 3.5
- Reliability 3.0
- Maintainer responsiveness 3.8
Why it got a C
Datalayer's MCP server for Jupyter (BSD-3-Clause, Python, PyPI jupyter-mcp-server 2.2.5, about 1.3K GitHub stars, 15 committers in the last 60 days). It connects to a JupyterLab or JupyterHub you already run, or to a cloud sandbox such as Colab or Daytona, and lets the AI open, read and edit notebooks, move and clear cells, and run cells or any code on the kernel. Datalayer also hosts it at mcp.datalayer.run with a browser sign-in and per-agent scopes; this listing scores the self-run package. Three advisories in 2026 hit its HTTP mode: the management routes had no login and could be reached by DNS rebinding, and the first fix trusted the Host header, so a forged header got past it until 2.1.3 (2026-09-01). Stay on 2.1.3 or later, keep MCP_TOKEN set, and start JupyterLab on 127.0.0.1, not the 0.0.0.0 the README example shows. Biggest deduction: running model-written code on your kernel is the point of the server and cannot be switched off, so give it a kernel and files you would let the AI run anything on.
How to connect
// claude_desktop_config.json (README, uvx quick start)
{ "mcpServers": { "jupyter": { "command": "uvx",
"args": ["jupyter-mcp-server@latest"],
"env": { "JUPYTER_URL": "http://localhost:8888",
"JUPYTER_TOKEN": "MY_TOKEN",
"ALLOW_IMG_OUTPUT": "true" } } } }
Is Jupyter MCP Server (Datalayer) safe?
Is Jupyter MCP Server (Datalayer) safe to use?
Jupyter MCP Server (Datalayer) grades C (usable with care). Login is required, but access is coarse: one sign-in or key covers more than your agent needs, so grant the narrowest account you can. Past advisories were fixed slowly, so stay on the latest release. It can run model-controlled code or uses a plaintext remote connection, so run it isolated with no credentials.
Does Jupyter MCP Server (Datalayer) have known vulnerabilities?
Not in our current data: it has no open CVEs or advisories. We re-check as new ones are published.
Does Jupyter MCP Server (Datalayer) support authentication?
Yes. It requires a login, so access can be tied to a person or a scoped key.
Alternatives in Developer Tools
- A Atlassian Rovo MCP ServerOfficial hosted Atlassian server for Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management, Compass, Bitbucket, Loom, Goals, Projects, and Teams, with OAuth 2.1 sign-in.
- A Buildkite MCP ServerOfficial Buildkite server for pipelines, builds, jobs, logs, annotations, and Test Engine data, hosted or local.
- A Dynatrace Remote MCP ServerDynatrace's hosted MCP server, running inside your Dynatrace SaaS environment, to run and explain DQL, look into problems, vulnerabilities and Kubernetes events, and forecast time series.
- A GitHub MCP ServerOfficial GitHub server for repos, issues, pull requests, Actions, and code security, hosted or local.
- A GitLab MCP ServerGitLab's built-in MCP server for projects, merge requests, work items, code, and CI pipelines, on GitLab.com or your own instance.
Community reviews
Fine for a demo, not for prod
It works in a demo, but things got shaky under real use. Token setup is the fiddliest part, after that it is smooth. I will check back in a few releases.
Used for Code review summaries for pull requests
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 2/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Quietly reliable
Been running this for about a month now. It drives a real browser, so I give it a separate profile with no saved logins. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file. It is in our production agent and I sleep fine.
Used for Pairing with Claude Code on a monorepo
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Works, just lock it down
Good for experimenting, still deciding about production. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. I would use it in prod, but only with a human approving writes.
Used for Keeping project tickets in sync with code changes
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 2/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Good defaults, good docs
Of the Jupyter (Datalayer) integrations I tried, this one is the most predictable. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Would recommend without hesitation.
Used for Internal developer assistant
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Fine once configured properly
Works well enough for what I need. The scope options are worth reading carefully, the defaults are broader than I wanted. Worth it, just do not skip the hardening steps.
Used for Onboarding new devs with an agent that answers repo questions
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 2/5
- Reliability 2/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Does the job, docs could be better
It does the job, but it took some tweaking. Narrowing the scopes took ten minutes and made me much happier running it. I like that access goes through a proper sign-in instead of a long-lived secret on disk. Recommended, with sensible guardrails.
Used for Letting a coding agent open and triage issues
- Setup & docs 2/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Recommended it to two teams already
Started with it as an experiment, now it is a fixture. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Running it in Docker keeps it away from the rest of my machine. Happy to run it in production.
Used for Scripting routine maintenance tasks
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Went back to calling the API directly
Setup was rough and the result was flaky. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. The scope options are worth reading carefully, the defaults are broader than I wanted. For anything real I would look elsewhere.
Used for Looking up Jupyter (Datalayer) data without leaving the editor
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 2/5
- Reliability 2/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Would not run this unattended
Ran into problems pretty quickly. Nice that it supports both stdio and HTTP, I use stdio locally and HTTP for the shared agent. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file. Keeping it to local experiments for now.
Used for Generating boilerplate from existing patterns
- Setup & docs 1/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 1/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Decent, not set-and-forget
Some tools are great, a couple feel half finished. I like that access goes through a proper sign-in instead of a long-lived secret on disk.
Used for Looking up Jupyter (Datalayer) data without leaving the editor
- Setup & docs 2/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Easy win for our agent setup
Simple to set up in Cursor, simple to reason about. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. Nice that it supports both stdio and HTTP, I use stdio locally and HTTP for the shared agent.
Used for Onboarding new devs with an agent that answers repo questions
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Clean integration, sensible permissions
I use this almost daily. I like that access goes through a proper sign-in instead of a long-lived secret on disk. Nice that it supports both stdio and HTTP, I use stdio locally and HTTP for the shared agent. Good choice if you need Jupyter (Datalayer) in your agent.
Used for Code review summaries for pull requests
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Not ready for anything that matters
Gave it a fair shot over two weeks. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file. Fine in production if you sandbox it.
Used for CI failure investigation
- Setup & docs 2/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 1/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Exactly what I needed from Jupyter (Datalayer)
Replaced a homegrown script with Jupyter MCP Server (Datalayer) and have not looked back. Nice that it supports both stdio and HTTP, I use stdio locally and HTTP for the shared agent. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Easy recommendation.
Used for Internal developer assistant
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Struggled to get it stable
I wanted to like this one. It drives a real browser, so I give it a separate profile with no saved logins. Not something I would put in production yet.
Used for Debugging sessions in Cursor
- Setup & docs 1/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 2/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Better than the DIY script it replaced
Installed it on a Friday, it was part of my workflow by Monday. Nice that it supports both stdio and HTTP, I use stdio locally and HTTP for the shared agent. Easy recommendation.
Used for Automating release notes
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Write a review
Ran this server? Tell other teams how it went. You get one review per server. We email you a link to confirm it, then an editor checks it before it goes up. We never show your email.