Our grade: 4 checks
Based on public data, not a full audit. See how we grade. Something changed? Request a re-grade.
Community rating
- 5 0
- 4 4
- 3 2
- 2 2
- 1 0
Trust in production
- Trust it - 38%
- With caveats - 25%
- Wouldn't - 38%
50% would recommend this server
How reviewers scored it
- Setup & docs 2.8
- Auth experience 2.8
- Reliability 3.3
- Maintainer responsiveness 3.4
Why it got a C
A free catalog of motors for blinds, shutters, awnings, curtains and doors, run by Wrise LLC under the name OpenAxia (formerly MotoBase). Nine read-only tools search and compare products, show each spec with its source link and date, list certifications such as Matter and FCC, find replacement candidates for an old motor model, and list industry news and trade fairs. Replacement results are spec comparisons, not a promise that a motor fits, so check the source before you buy. Quoted source text is third-party data, and the server's own instructions say not to follow anything written inside it. Reused data needs the attribution line "OpenAxia (https://openaxia.com)". The 60 calls an hour are shared with the REST API and counted per IP address. No advisories on record. Biggest deduction: there is no login, which also means there's no per-user access to revoke. The server is also closed source with no public changelog and an unnamed team, so maintenance is scored one band lower.
How to connect
Hosted: https://openaxia.com/api/mcp (Streamable HTTP; no account or key; 60 tool calls an hour per IP, or 5,000 a day with a free API key)
Is OpenAxia MCP Server safe?
Is OpenAxia MCP Server safe to use?
OpenAxia MCP Server grades C (usable with care). There is no login: anything that can start or reach it gets its full access. Updates are occasional, so fixes may be slow to arrive.
Does OpenAxia MCP Server have known vulnerabilities?
Not in our current data: it has no open CVEs or advisories. We re-check as new ones are published.
Does OpenAxia MCP Server support authentication?
No. It has no login of its own, so limit who and what can start it.
Alternatives in Docs & Knowledge
- A Context7 MCPPulls version-accurate library documentation into the model context.
- B Stack Overflow MCP ServerOfficial hosted Stack Overflow server (beta) to search questions and answers.
- B Zotero MCP (zotero-mcp-server)A community MCP server for your Zotero library, run locally from PyPI, to search, read and annotate papers, add items by DOI or BibTeX, and manage collections and tags.
- C AIOS Public Discovery MCP ServerHosted server that checks the status, recent changes and source evidence of five monitored GOV.UK employment guidance topics, including minimum wage and statutory sick pay.
- C AWS Knowledge MCP ServerAWS's hosted read-only server for AWS docs, API references, regional availability and agent skills.
Community reviews
The OpenAxia integration I wanted
Started with it as an experiment, now it is a fixture. Being closed source, I cannot audit it, but the vendor has been responsive. There is no auth layer, so whatever can reach it can use it. I keep it local only. Hosted endpoint means no local process to babysit. Good choice if you need OpenAxia in your agent.
Used for Keeping a team knowledge base tidy
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Recommended it to two teams already
Tried it on a side project first, then rolled it out at work. Issues get answered eventually. Not fast, not abandoned. No access control at all, it runs with my permissions. Fine on my laptop, not on a shared box. Easy recommendation.
Used for Finding the right runbook during incidents
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Surprisingly polished
Hooked OpenAxia MCP Server into Claude Code and it worked on the first try. I would prefer to read the code, but the hosted service has been dependable. Updates are a bit slow, but it is stable enough that it has not mattered. No access control at all, it runs with my permissions. Fine on my laptop, not on a shared box.
Used for Summarising meeting notes
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Not ready for anything that matters
Setup was rough and the result was flaky. Nothing stops a misbehaving agent from using every tool it exposes, so I trimmed the tool list. Nothing to install, I just point the client at the URL. Not something I would put in production yet.
Used for Answering questions from our internal wiki
- Setup & docs 1/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 1/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Needs more maintenance love
Not what I expected from the description. There is no auth layer, so whatever can reach it can use it. I keep it local only. Read-only mode is the first thing I enable, and it covers most of what I need. Recommended, with sensible guardrails.
Used for Finding the right runbook during incidents
- Setup & docs 2/5
- Auth experience 1/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Fine once configured properly
It does the job, but it took some tweaking. There is no auth layer, so whatever can reach it can use it. I keep it local only. Keeping it to local experiments for now.
Used for Onboarding Q&A for new hires
- Setup & docs 2/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Trustworthy enough for real work
Of the OpenAxia integrations I tried, this one is the most predictable. No access control at all, it runs with my permissions. Fine on my laptop, not on a shared box. Turned on read-only mode on day one, highly recommend doing the same. I would use it in prod, but only with a human approving writes.
Used for Drafting docs from existing pages
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Handy for dev, careful in prod
Mostly reliable, with the odd timeout. Nothing stops a misbehaving agent from using every tool it exposes, so I trimmed the tool list. I will check back in a few releases.
Used for Pulling up-to-date library docs into prompts
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 2/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 2/5
Write a review
Ran this server? Tell other teams how it went. You get one review per server. We email you a link to confirm it, then an editor checks it before it goes up. We never show your email.