VendorInkRoom
Connects overstdio, http

Our grade: 4 checks

Login No authentication
Upkeep Moderate · 2026-10
Known bugs 0 open
Connection stdio, http

Based on public data, not a full audit. See how we grade. Something changed? Request a re-grade.

Community rating

3.4 17 reviews
18% would trust it in production
  • 5 1
  • 4 7
  • 3 6
  • 2 3
  • 1 0

Trust in production

  • Trust it - 18%
  • With caveats - 59%
  • Wouldn't - 24%

53% would recommend this server

How reviewers scored it

  • Setup & docs 3.4
  • Auth experience 2.7
  • Reliability 3.2
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3.6

Why it got a C

An MIT-licensed Node server (four tools: help, list_models, search_prompts, optimize_prompt) that runs on your machine over stdio and calls InkRoom's hosted API for the prompt data, with shared free-use quotas. It needs no account or key, never generates images, and runs no shell commands. The optional HTTP mode listens only on 127.0.0.1 and rejects other origins. Prompts it returns were written by other people, so treat them as untrusted text. The MIT license covers this distribution only, not third-party prompts or images, or InkRoom's separate hosted Image MCP. No advisories on record. Biggest deduction: there is no auth layer at all. Also check the source: the install command runs a release archive from the inkroom-client repository, where development happens. The inkroom-prompts repo is a one-way export of that prompts-v1.0.4 release, with per-file hashes in SOURCE_MANIFEST.json. To run from source instead, clone inkroom-prompts, run npm ci --ignore-scripts, then start src/cli.mjs with node.

How to connect

// .cursor/mcp.json
{ "mcpServers": { "inkroom-prompts": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "--package", "https://github.com/InkRoom-AI/inkroom-client/releases/download/prompts-v1.0.4/inkroom-prompts-1.0.4.tgz", "inkroom-prompts"] } } }

Is InkRoom Prompts MCP Server safe?

Is InkRoom Prompts MCP Server safe to use?

InkRoom Prompts MCP Server grades C (usable with care). There is no login: anything that can start or reach it gets its full access. Updates are occasional, so fixes may be slow to arrive. It runs locally over stdio, so it acts with your machine's access.

Does InkRoom Prompts MCP Server have known vulnerabilities?

Not in our current data: it has no open CVEs or advisories. We re-check as new ones are published.

Does InkRoom Prompts MCP Server support authentication?

No. It has no login of its own, so limit who and what can start it.

Embed this badge

Maintain this server? Add the grade to your README.

TrustedMCP grade C

Markdown

[![TrustedMCP grade C](https://trustedmcp.io/badge/inkroom-prompts-mcp.svg)](https://trustedmcp.io/servers/inkroom-prompts-mcp)

HTML

<a href="https://trustedmcp.io/servers/inkroom-prompts-mcp"><img src="https://trustedmcp.io/badge/inkroom-prompts-mcp.svg" alt="TrustedMCP grade C" height="80"></a>

Community reviews

Hannah Larsen Analyst
Would not trust in production

Useful, with a few rough edges

Works well enough for what I need. Issues get answered eventually. Not fast, not abandoned. I will check back in a few releases.

Used for Grounding answers with live results

  • Setup & docs 2/5
  • Auth experience 2/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Lucas Silva Staff engineer
Trusts with caveats

Good, but read the permissions first

Useful tool, though I would not hand it to a junior unsupervised. Nice that it supports both stdio and HTTP, I use stdio locally and HTTP for the shared agent. Keep permissions tight and it is a good tool.

Used for Competitive research

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 4/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Eva Novak Solo founder
Would not trust in production

Handy for dev, careful in prod

I like it, with reservations. Nothing stops a misbehaving agent from using every tool it exposes, so I trimmed the tool list. For anything real I would look elsewhere.

Used for Technical research while coding

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 3/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Lina Haddad Security engineer
Trusts with caveats

Does the job, docs could be better

Mostly reliable, with the odd timeout. There is no auth layer, so whatever can reach it can use it. I keep it local only. Fine in production if you sandbox it.

Used for Grounding answers with live results

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 4/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Ben Carter CTO, early-stage startup
Would not trust in production

Too much access for my comfort

Ran into problems pretty quickly. No access control at all, it runs with my permissions. Fine on my laptop, not on a shared box. Not something I would put in production yet.

Used for Finding recent sources for articles

  • Setup & docs 2/5
  • Auth experience 2/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Ayesha Siddiqui ML engineer
Trusts with caveats Recommends

Good defaults, good docs

Of the InkRoom Prompts integrations I tried, this one is the most predictable. There is no auth layer, so whatever can reach it can use it. I keep it local only. Updates are a bit slow, but it is stable enough that it has not mattered.

Used for Technical research while coding

  • Setup & docs 4/5
  • Auth experience 2/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Yuki Tanaka Senior developer
Trusts in production Recommends

Our team uses it every day

I use this almost daily. Nothing stops a misbehaving agent from using every tool it exposes, so I trimmed the tool list. It is in our production agent and I sleep fine.

Used for Collecting references for reports

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 4/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Noah Fischer AI engineer
Trusts in production Recommends

Easy win for our agent setup

Started with it as an experiment, now it is a fixture. Issues get answered eventually. Not fast, not abandoned. Nothing stops a misbehaving agent from using every tool it exposes, so I trimmed the tool list.

Used for Research agent for market questions

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 3/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Sam Rivera Software engineer, agency
Trusts with caveats Recommends

Saves me a context switch every hour

Set this up for our team after comparing a few options. There is no auth layer, so whatever can reach it can use it. I keep it local only. Worth it, just do not skip the hardening steps.

Used for Collecting references for reports

  • Setup & docs 4/5
  • Auth experience 2/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Anika Gupta Backend engineer
Would not trust in production

Fine once configured properly

It does the job, but it took some tweaking. Nice that it supports both stdio and HTTP, I use stdio locally and HTTP for the shared agent. Release pace is moderate, so I pin a version and check in monthly.

Used for Research agent for market questions

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 4/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Ivan Horvat Eng lead, fintech
Trusts with caveats Recommends

Quietly reliable

Replaced a homegrown script with InkRoom Prompts MCP Server and have not looked back. There is no auth layer, so whatever can reach it can use it. I keep it local only.

Used for Competitive research

  • Setup & docs 4/5
  • Auth experience 3/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Grace Park Platform engineer
Trusts with caveats Recommends

Surprisingly polished

Installed it on a Friday, it was part of my workflow by Monday. Nice that it supports both stdio and HTTP, I use stdio locally and HTTP for the shared agent. Updates are a bit slow, but it is stable enough that it has not mattered. Recommended, with sensible guardrails.

Used for Finding recent sources for articles

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 2/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Kofi Mensah Full-stack developer
Trusts with caveats Recommends

The InkRoom Prompts integration I wanted

Clear tool names, sensible outputs, very few surprises. Nothing stops a misbehaving agent from using every tool it exposes, so I trimmed the tool list.

Used for Grounding answers with live results

  • Setup & docs 4/5
  • Auth experience 2/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Tobias Becker Developer, healthtech
Trusts with caveats Recommends

OK for read-only work

Some tools are great, a couple feel half finished. Updates are a bit slow, but it is stable enough that it has not mattered. No access control at all, it runs with my permissions. Fine on my laptop, not on a shared box. I would use it in prod, but only with a human approving writes.

Used for Fact-checking drafts

  • Setup & docs 4/5
  • Auth experience 2/5
  • Reliability 2/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Elif Yilmaz Research engineer
Trusts with caveats

Too many sharp edges

Gave it a fair shot over two weeks. Release pace is moderate, so I pin a version and check in monthly. No access control at all, it runs with my permissions. Fine on my laptop, not on a shared box. Recommended, with sensible guardrails.

Used for Fact-checking drafts

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 2/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 2/5
Maya Johnson Content lead
Trusts in production Recommends

Earned a permanent spot in my config

Tried it on a side project first, then rolled it out at work. There is no auth layer, so whatever can reach it can use it. I keep it local only. Nice that it supports both stdio and HTTP, I use stdio locally and HTTP for the shared agent. Happy to run it in production.

Used for Fact-checking drafts

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 3/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Emily Chen Freelance developer
Trusts with caveats

Needs more maintenance love

It works in a demo, but things got shaky under real use. Nothing stops a misbehaving agent from using every tool it exposes, so I trimmed the tool list.

Used for Technical research while coding

  • Setup & docs 1/5
  • Auth experience 2/5
  • Reliability 2/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5

Write a review

Ran this server? Tell other teams how it went. You get one review per server. We email you a link to confirm it, then an editor checks it before it goes up. We never show your email.

How was it overall?

Would you trust it in production?
Would you recommend it to another team?

Score the details

Setup & docs
Auth experience
Reliability
Maintainer responsiveness

Tell other teams how it went

About you